In his book The Web of Life, Fritjof Capra offers two ways of thinking: the self-assertive paradigm and the integrative paradigm. The self-assertive paradigm involves linear and analytical thinking, it is based on a reductionist point of view where a complicated problem is reduced to its simpler components. The integrative paradigm involves nonlinear and intuitive thinking, and it involves a more holistic view of the word. Capra argues that given the exquisite complexity of nature, the integrative paradigm may offer a more accurate description of the natural world than the self-assertive paradigm.

Perhaps even more importantly, the two paradigms are characterized by different values. The self-assertive paradigm is about expansion, competition, quantity, and domination. The integrative paradigm is about conservation, cooperation, quality, and partnership. The 2024 US elections were largely about a choice between the self-assertive and integrative paradigms, and it is interesting to reflect on what the two paradigms mean for the environment, for justice, and for international relations.

I encourage you to reflect on the implications of the two paradigms for your personal and professional life. Here are some questions to ponder that are related to the four values in the table.

  • How do you balance expansion versus conservation? This question has an obvious environmental dimension. In principle, most of us are all for conservation, but we also want to heat our homes, travel (I have done terrible in this regard), and may want own “stuff”. How do you decide what is acceptable? The question of expansion vs. conservation also has a personal dimension. For example, how do you balance the expansion of your career with the conservation of your wellbeing and personal relations?
  • To what extent do you embrace competition? Competition clearly is a driver in our society, and there are merits to a certain level of competition. (What would sports be like without a desire to compete and win?) Does your inclination to compete or collaborate depend on what is at stake? How do you make sure that the voice of those who may not have a competitive mindset is heard?
  • How do you balance the quantity of your income with the quality of life? Americans have higher incomes than Europeans at the expense of much less free time. What lifestyle do you prefer? How do you reconcile spending quality time with others to the quantity of your income? This question presumes that you can make this choice, I am aware that is not possible for everybody.
  • When you work or live together with others, so you seek to do so as loyal partners, or do you seek to dominate in the pursuit of your goals? Do you have a focus on reaching personal goals, or is it about being part of a harmonious network? What does the concept of partnership look like for you at work or in your personal life?

An honest reflection may reveal that the choice between these paradigms is not a black or white issue, and this reflection may provide interesting insights on how you want to show up in your personal and professional life.

Roel Snieder

Subscribe To Roel's Newsletter

Join Roel's mailing list to receive my latest articles and updates about upcoming classes and workshops.

You have Successfully Subscribed!